<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Corporate Blogger Policy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogsecurity.net/corporate/corporate-bloggers-policy/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogsecurity.net/corporate/corporate-bloggers-policy</link>
	<description>Always something worth reading...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:09:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Kierznowski</title>
		<link>http://blogsecurity.net/corporate/corporate-bloggers-policy/comment-page-1#comment-1370</link>
		<dc:creator>David Kierznowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 22:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogsecurity.net/corporate/corporate-bloggers-policy/#comment-1370</guid>
		<description>Gary, I am in the UK as well :)

The project would have to be broken down with legalities and censorship as a seperate portion of the overall document. If the general policy succeeded in the UK, others can easily adopt it; however, at the moment its all just ideas in the air.

Spambam note taken, thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gary, I am in the UK as well :)</p>
<p>The project would have to be broken down with legalities and censorship as a seperate portion of the overall document. If the general policy succeeded in the UK, others can easily adopt it; however, at the moment its all just ideas in the air.</p>
<p>Spambam note taken, thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://blogsecurity.net/corporate/corporate-bloggers-policy/comment-page-1#comment-1368</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 20:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogsecurity.net/corporate/corporate-bloggers-policy/#comment-1368</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m in the UK.  There are also bloggers in Canada, Australia and New Zealand.  I understand there are even a few bloggers in the U.S.  :-)

Your idea of covering legalities (and probably censorship) is going to be a huge undertaking to cover even just the few different English-speaking territories...  Frankly, I think it&#039;s pointless.  If you come up with a document which only documents/encourages US laws, the first thing I&#039;ll do is laugh at it/you.  Then I&#039;ll get pissed that you think you can make me follow your laws.  By then, you&#039;ve lost any respect that you&#039;ve started out with.

However...  Policy doesn&#039;t necessarily mean legality.  It would probably be easier to to write and encourage some sort of &quot;moral code&quot;.

----

BTW I just tried to post this comment from Safari 3.0.3 (beta) on a Mac - with JavaScript enabled.  And your new SpamBlam blocker blocked my comment claiming JavaScript was required.  Let&#039;s hope my Firefox works better.  Please investigate!  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m in the UK.  There are also bloggers in Canada, Australia and New Zealand.  I understand there are even a few bloggers in the U.S.  :-)</p>
<p>Your idea of covering legalities (and probably censorship) is going to be a huge undertaking to cover even just the few different English-speaking territories&#8230;  Frankly, I think it&#8217;s pointless.  If you come up with a document which only documents/encourages US laws, the first thing I&#8217;ll do is laugh at it/you.  Then I&#8217;ll get pissed that you think you can make me follow your laws.  By then, you&#8217;ve lost any respect that you&#8217;ve started out with.</p>
<p>However&#8230;  Policy doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean legality.  It would probably be easier to to write and encourage some sort of &#8220;moral code&#8221;.</p>
<p>&#8212;-</p>
<p>BTW I just tried to post this comment from Safari 3.0.3 (beta) on a Mac &#8211; with JavaScript enabled.  And your new SpamBlam blocker blocked my comment claiming JavaScript was required.  Let&#8217;s hope my Firefox works better.  Please investigate!  :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Kierznowski</title>
		<link>http://blogsecurity.net/corporate/corporate-bloggers-policy/comment-page-1#comment-1350</link>
		<dc:creator>David Kierznowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 20:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogsecurity.net/corporate/corporate-bloggers-policy/#comment-1350</guid>
		<description>Interesting yes, but can you visualise it being utilised in a standard like ISO27001 (BS7799)? Thats really the question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting yes, but can you visualise it being utilised in a standard like ISO27001 (BS7799)? Thats really the question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah Turner</title>
		<link>http://blogsecurity.net/corporate/corporate-bloggers-policy/comment-page-1#comment-1343</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 16:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogsecurity.net/corporate/corporate-bloggers-policy/#comment-1343</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d say that one is definitely required and personally I think that it&#039;d be very interesting to read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d say that one is definitely required and personally I think that it&#8217;d be very interesting to read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
