<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WordPress 2.2.2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogsecurity.net/wordpress/news-050807/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogsecurity.net/wordpress/news-050807</link>
	<description>Always something worth reading...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:09:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://blogsecurity.net/wordpress/news-050807/comment-page-1#comment-687</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 16:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogsecurity.net/wordpress/news-050807/#comment-687</guid>
		<description>Wordpress 2.0.11 was _finally_ released after months of sitting at RC5 in SVN (and RC3 on the downloads archive page oddly enough).  All those using the &quot;legacy&quot; 2.0.x branch will want to &lt;a href=&quot;http://wordpress.org/download/legacy/&quot; title=&quot;Wordpress Legacy branch&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;upgrade&lt;/a&gt; asap.

This branch is slated to be supported with security and critical fixes until 2010.  However, priority has definitely not been on getting these fixes actually released in a timely manner.  I find their own comparison (made on the page linked to above) to the Debian stable/testing release cycle to be highly laughable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wordpress 2.0.11 was _finally_ released after months of sitting at RC5 in SVN (and RC3 on the downloads archive page oddly enough).  All those using the &#8220;legacy&#8221; 2.0.x branch will want to <a href="http://wordpress.org/download/legacy/" title="Wordpress Legacy branch" rel="nofollow">upgrade</a> asap.</p>
<p>This branch is slated to be supported with security and critical fixes until 2010.  However, priority has definitely not been on getting these fixes actually released in a timely manner.  I find their own comparison (made on the page linked to above) to the Debian stable/testing release cycle to be highly laughable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
